<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Joseph Brazier Online</title>
	<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news</link>
	<description>News and Information on Fine Firearms Design, Manufacturing, History, and the Gun Making Trade</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>UGS Engineer Wanted</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/36/ugs-engineer-wanted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/36/ugs-engineer-wanted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Information</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/36/ugs-engineer-wanted/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are hiring a Siemens Unigraphics NX5 qualified CAD engineer ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong></strong><strong>Now Hiring CAD/CAM Engineer  for:</strong><br />
<strong>Joseph Brazier, Ltd. (Colorado) </strong><br />
Address:1419 Woolsey Heights, Colorado Springs, CO 80915.<br />
Type: <strong>Full-time, Part-time </strong><br />
Job Description:<br />
We are hiring a <strong>Siemens Unigraphics NX5 </strong>qualified CAD engineer for design entry, reverse engineering and internal designed parts for production. <strong>SolidWorks, ProE  </strong>qualified engineers will be considered. Cross over to <strong>NX5 and NX6 </strong>is not difficult but required. We have about 25 years of work ahead and currently building an engineering shop. Our primary design work is in firearms but can extend from tooling to fishing reels. We have been supplying the Trade with design engineering and products since 1827. </p>
	<p><strong>Karl Lippard, Chief Design Engineer</strong><br />
<strong>Apply to:</strong><br />
Email:karl@josephbrazier.com or<br />
Contact page on this website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/36/ugs-engineer-wanted/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Issue of Weight on the 1911</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/35/an-issue-of-weight-on-the-1911/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/35/an-issue-of-weight-on-the-1911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Information</category>
	<category>Technical</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/35/an-issue-of-weight-on-the-1911/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I responded to an email/article with a little dissertation on gun design ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Authors Note: Don&#8217;t forget to read the article on the &#8220;Combat NCO Revisited&#8221; found in the article listing to the right of your screen. References made to the NCO Model pistol here for those not familar can come up to speed on that by seeing and reading this article&#8230;.</strong></p>
	<p>This copy covers a number of areas that concern a lot of people. And that is <em>an issue of gun weight</em>. Recently I responded to an email/article with a little dissertation on gun design wherein the issue of<strong> weight </strong>was part of the topic. The understanding of the relationship of a guns weight relative to recoil is important and before a gun is designed a certain criteria must be met mentally <strong>FIRST</strong> before one begins. For those interested in <strong>Colt Model 1911’s or Sniper rifles</strong>, this commentary might have value for you. I extracted some text from that conversation for you to read.</p>
	<p><strong>Quoting from Karl Lippard correspondence to a retired Marine Corps General on the subject and various Marines in copy: </strong></p>
	<p>“On the business of guns the issue of <strong>weight to caliber ratio </strong>I have come up with has been foremost in mind when designing a Shotgun, Rifle or pistol. All are based on criteria of application of course. That equation is the basis of thought before any gun design is even considered. (I guess in the Space Program is where it began. “We are going to the moon and this is all the space and weight we can give you. Make it happen.”) But the analogy to understanding would be like this. You and I would agree that a .22 should not weight 20 pounds. We would also say that 1 pound might be too light. So what would that correct weight be? And the answer would be: a “comfort level that the rifle could be used effectively.” So if we extrapolate that to a <strong>1911 Combat NCO </strong>as example we know that the pistol should weigh (and is) 3.7 pounds (2.14 unloaded) this to offset a projectile of 830 grains at 802 fps. This is 7 ounces MORE than the M1911 specifications and 2 inches longer than the 8.593 inches specified. But, the original <strong>Colt M1911 </strong>was not made to an equation but a similar weight and barrel length of a <strong>Single Action Colt</strong>. Therefore if one has the equation for a pistol, shotgun or rifle and apply that to a given caliber, there the effects of different applications can be discussed before a design is begun. We know for example that a <em>Commander</em> length weapon has some disadvantages because of its length sure. But, the comfort level goes down as recoil is increased and a host of other issues that are obvious. But if the pistol being short has a use criteria of defense at the defense range of 7 feet… and not used often, then the added inaccuracy and recoil associated are generally not a factor. There-fore <em>Commander</em>, okay. And also it can be seen that a .38, .32 etc. need not be as heavy a pistol either BUT, that a <strong>.500 S&#038;W </strong>we will need to do something to bring that caliber back into the ratio of comfort/weight/velocity/mass, in line. The “how much” is in the equation.<br />
So now that we are all on the same equation basis and we look at a loaded .308 at 10 pounds we can see that is about right. But the comfort level being 8.5- 8.8 can we just cut weight out of it to get there? No. But we can make the rifle gas operated semi automatic and reduce it can’t we? And we can maybe use <strong>Karl’s compensation design of opposing forces</strong> can’t we. And now we have our weight of 8.5 on the rifle. But if we used sabots we can drop it further<strong> to 5 pounds</strong>? Ahhhh. And if we change the way barrels are lined to reduce friction can we drop it to <strong>3.5</strong>? Sure we can and the cost goes right down with it too. Ahhhh!”</p>
	<p>Well, as you were not in the conversation and don’t know really what we were talking about specifically I think you can understand the jest. Math says the <strong>M9 pistol </strong>is <strong>NOT a useful platform </strong>for the purpose intended. (Neither was the <strong>Walther P39 </strong>from which it came) The criterion should be designing guns for an intended purpose using a formula for effective use. The <strong>Model 1911 in .45acp DOES meet the criteria for military application </strong>and needs only a few upgrades to be serviceable for another 100 years……And we have the Patent Pending on those modifications. Every other weapon in the military has been changed, enhanced, and or upgraded except the M1911 pistol. Why is that? And they picked a 9mm M9 to replace it? I thought we learned something in the Philippines about the .38 calibers?<br />
And that also says the <strong>M40 Sniper Rifle </strong>in use today is entirely wrong as well. Why would I design a weapon for any hand held purpose over 20 pounds?  Oh, and have the Marine carry <strong>another </strong>rifle to defend himself and drag the M40 in a bag! The man who sold that plan to the military can sell sand in Arabia!!!<br />
What we re-learn all this again in Iraq? Please.  Oh we are not? So why are we reading this now?</p>
	<p><strong>“Marine Corps, Army want long-range sniper rifle”<br />
By Matthew Cox - Staff Writer<br />
Posted : Wednesday May 21, 2008 10:37:29 EDT<br />
DALLAS — The Army and the Marine Corps both want a new, long-range sniper rifle, designed to kill enemy out to 1,800 meters.</strong></p>
	<p><strong>Responding is Karl Lippard again:</strong><br />
“For sure there are two of us here that can shoot and shoot at the distance required. The first criterion in 1987 was a <strong>Russian Anti-tank Commander rifle </strong>to shoot tank commanders before they closed up at 1,250 yards. (No offense here to the Russians. This was a defense application) Funny, the rifle caliber case we used is the one I use now. A .423 WR. (Standard length action) It used a .416 projectile. Now of course for civilian use I use a .434 bullet for elephant (some call them tanks) and Sabot those also to .358 at over 6,000 pfs. I intend to play (with my new bullets) at over 10,000 fps which will reduce my recoil and fly farther than anything conventionally made today. I think I can say without testing that we can do this distance accurately right now AND, with a 9 pound rifle. Let me play a little with my new barrels and new designed Sabot and we can go 3,000 meters plus plus. As no one has been there, (not with my type bullets, barrels and sabots) I do not know its maximum range. <strong>My bullets levitate in air </strong>that lets them fly faster and farther than any bullets ever made. It is so simple it is stupid really.<br />
So I guess when I can get to it we&#8217;ll see.  BUT, if someone really wants to make a rifle like this, show me the money. Doing it is really nothing. When the target was going to the moon <strong>THAT </strong>was a challenge!<br />
If they (the military) want a semi-auto rifle it can be designed and produced <strong>in one year </strong>from nice, nasty or scary version depending on how far one wants to go. Like the Stealth, I prefer scary. I say go <em>there</em>  while you have the chance.  AND, I can draw all three versions of these weapons in ? say, 30 minutes.”</p>
	<p><strong>Really now 30 minutes? </strong></p>
	<p><strong>Actually yes. </strong>We did that at <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>offices before a General Grade Officer and staff from criteria given. We think a fine Marine Corps Sniper and an  issue rifle too that exceeds all criteria given in conversation. <strong>For IF a weapon designer cannot draw a concept to meet a criterion, without preparation, before your face,…..in less than 30 minutes, then he isn’t worth his salt and you have got the wrong man.</strong><br />
The “wheel” as example has been around for what ? thousands of years? Have never discarded it have we? In fact we are &#8220;in LOVE with the wheel.” So much so in fact that it has been advanced and revised in design many times. But, when it comes to say a pistol, the  <strong>Colt 1911 A1 </strong>the military has changed nothing to make it more accurate, improve it sights, extend its life or reduce its recoil since 1911!!  Since 1895 to my criteria above. Why is that? <strong>I can say with authority that over 100,000 M1911’s out of service can be put back on the line for $7.00 each and be accurate. </strong>In fact they have the parts I sent for that purpose right now…….That designs exist that can further upgrade a <strong>M1911 to a A3 and A4 </strong>to surpass military needs for 100 years at 1/3rd of the cost of a M9……AND, even a housewife can shoot it accurately. <strong>(Did someone say, &#8220;Combat NCO&#8221; model A2? Hello? How many patents or patents pending on that 1911? Seven. SEVEN!!! And not one modification on the Military 1911 A1 since 1911? What? What&#8217;s wrong with this picture?) </strong>That a new military rifle design is available to suit our needs for 100 years…..Designed and can be made in the USA by the way, not some foreign land that bleeds American’s of jobs. <strong>So what IS THE PROBLEM?</strong> The problem my friends is US. </p>
	<p><strong>The United States has made it so difficult to make and produce firearms in the USA </strong>that just about all guns are foreign made today except maybe Colt and those are copied, made in Brazil, have a shinny finish and mostly are junk inside. The US eats baby food and hands it troop’s guns they used to give to Indians. They rely on foreign powers to feed them guns without criteria; build ships, aircraft, missiles, computers and electronics and nearly everything else overseas bleeding our economy and manufacturing white collar workers. (H&#038;K produces 60% of all military weapons in the USA. In Austria.)</p>
	<p>So your question I would guess IS, <strong>“Can your (Joseph Brazier/Karl Lippard) M1911 Combat NCO be made for less than $1,000.00? </strong>Can you make quality rifles, pistol and shotguns to compete with other government subsidized imports? </p>
	<p><strong>My answer to that is yes. </strong>But not making them by hand one at a time. </p>
	<p>We possess in America all the tools and designs <strong>“in the can”</strong> so to speak to crush the imports……….My question is, <strong>“When are American’s going to take their production back?” </strong><br />
I answer, <strong>&#8220;When American’s are tired of this outflow of technology and jobs to other countries they will eventually stand up and say so.&#8221;</strong></p>
	<p><strong>And when is that? </strong></p>
	<p><strong>It is when you finish this article and have what it takes to pick up the phone or write an email to the Senate. We hired men up there to manage our country resources. And if by chance they don&#8217;t know HOW to fix that probem, have them call me. They know my number and I will be happy to explain&#8230;&#8230; for the hundredth time. There is no pork in offshore manufacturing. Take the pork off production here and we can compete and America benefits.<br />
America benefits 4 to 1 over a foreign bid. Why? Because our economy keeps the money here. Our government keeps the taxes here. The technology is kept here. The revenue to buy houses, cars; the challenge to education to produce engineers and blue collar workers would remain here. The standard of living would be supported and the outflow of dollars for imported goods brought back into balance. Bring the value of the dollar back in our hands and not the Federal Reserve. So if this is what you want, take it back. Take America back today before it is bled out completely.</strong></p>
	<p><strong>My name is Karl Lippard and I approve this message. (Smile) </strong>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/35/an-issue-of-weight-on-the-1911/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nice to see our parts FLY!!</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/34/nice-to-see-our-parts-fly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/34/nice-to-see-our-parts-fly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Information</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/34/nice-to-see-our-parts-fly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	You know, when a company does engineering for the Trade and makes parts, rarely do we have the opportunity to see the finished product come to life. With permission from Coppercrow.com to use their pictures, here for eye food are some of the guns from Karl Lippard Designs. 
	
A pair of Karl Lippard Custom O/U [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You know, when a company does engineering for the Trade and makes parts, rarely do we have the opportunity to see the finished product come to life. With permission from <strong><a href="http://www.coppercrow.com">Coppercrow.com</a></strong> to use their pictures, here for eye food are some of the guns from <strong><a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard Designs.</a></strong> </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/61.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>A pair of Karl Lippard Custom O/U 20 gauges engraved by Lee Griffiths.</strong> </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/81.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Another fine example engraved by brother Gary Griffiths. The customer picked the beautiful pattern from a Joseph Lang shotgun seen in Shooting Sportsman Magazine. Interesting thing too about this gun; <em>the owner ordered it before the drawings of the shotgun were completed</em>. There was no prototype ever made!</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/161.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>How about a peek at some Brazier wood on one of these guns!</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/131.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Here another fine example engraved by Barry Lee Hands.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/211.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>And yet another example engraved by Charles Lee.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/KarlLippardSignature1.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>A <a href="http://www.karllippard.com/New_Guns.html">Karl Lippard Signature model </a>is just a complete package isn&#8217;t it?</strong></p>
	<p>What can one say about these American designed and made guns? <strong><em>SolidSolid</em> &#8482;</strong> one piece barrels, S7 vacuum arc remelt steel throughout. Whew!! It makes us happy to have been a part of these very technically advanced firearms. </p>
	<p><strong>Can we make components or design something for you? Joseph Brazier, Ltd., we make things happen!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/34/nice-to-see-our-parts-fly/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNC Wood Available</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/33/cnc-wood-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/33/cnc-wood-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Technical</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/33/cnc-wood-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Joseph Brazier, Ltd. has perfected CNC wood production using a State of the Art  Bacci CNC machine that holds 25 micron tolerance. 
	
From a solid blank to a finished piece of wood in one setup.
	Wood actually selected at the Joseph Brazier factory for a Karl Lippard designed O/U sidelock shotgun, can be made while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joseph Brazier, Ltd. has perfected CNC wood production using a <em>State of the Art  </em><strong>Bacci </strong>CNC machine that holds 25 micron tolerance. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Stockandblock2.jpg' alt='wood block' /><br />
<strong>From a solid blank to a finished piece of wood in one setup.</strong></p>
	<p>Wood actually selected at the <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>factory for a <strong><a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard </a>designed</strong> O/U sidelock shotgun, can be made while the customer has lunch! That&#8217;s right, lunch. Any other manufacturer it would take months to make a stock and custom wood&#8230;try 6 months to two years.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/BridwellCover.jpg' alt='Shotgun' /><br />
<strong>A Karl Lippard designed O/U is the ultimate shotgun for the connoisseur. Not only does it sport interchangeable wood from <em>Joseph Brazier</em>, but all metal parts are made of </strong><strong>S7 VAC tool steel</strong>. The barrels are also made of <strong>ONE PIECE OF STEEL</strong>. The only shotgun made in the world with this <strong><em>Patented</em></strong> process.</p>
	<p>Soon, <strong>Browning, Kreigoff, Perazzi, Beretta </strong>and other fine gun stocks will be in CAD at <strong>Joseph Brazier</strong>. Ordering an unfinished stock will be fast and accurately made ready for stock finish and checkering.  </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Uprightcuting.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>A one piece CNC operation on a <a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard </a>designed O/U sidelock shotgun.</strong></p>
	<p>Sidelock shotguns are complicated and difficult to head-up much less cut to specifications. But by CNC it requires a very qualified person to reduce it to CAD/CAM. And while it may be a short period of time to make, the actual CAD/CAM time is often 40 hours of dedicated labor to achieve a good result. A sidelock buttstock of the <strong>Karl Lippard </strong>complication cost $1,950.00. and up plus wood.  A <strong>Browning or Perazzi </strong>stock start at about $900.00 plus wood and Pad. So contact <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>or ask your favorite gun manufacturer or gunsmith to consider the <em>Joseph Brazier </em>solution for your stock requirements.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Head.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>The &#8220;Head&#8221; of the stock is the most difficult to make.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/NewForendIn.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>An accurately cut forend for a O/U.</strong></p>
	<p><strong>Joseph Brazier, Ltd.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/33/cnc-wood-available/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Combat NCO&#8221; revisited.</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/31/combat-nco-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/31/combat-nco-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Information</category>
	<category>Technical</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/31/combat-nco-revisited/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Problem with the 1911 A1 pistol is that it was not designed as an "Offensive weapon".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Many people ask about the <strong>&#8220;Combat NCO&#8221;</strong> pistol, its history, why no one has ever written about it and basically what&#8217;s it all about. </p>
	<p><strong>First of all, it is only <em>life time warranted pistol ever made.</em> I repeat, &#8220;It is the only Lifetime warranted pistol ever made.&#8221;</strong> Excuse me! Uhhh, what does that mean?<br />
<strong>It means wear something out and we replace it. Shoot out the barrel, burn a hammer; so what; it&#8217;s in warranty&#8230;&#8230;.</strong><br />
Beyond that, lets digress a little. </p>
	<div align="center"><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/1911A1copy.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>John Browning designed Colt Government Model 1911 A1</strong></p>
	<p>John Browning invented or began designing the  to be <strong>Colt model 1911 </strong>automatic pistol and filed his first patent September 14, 1895, for a Firearm: Blowback Pistol. In short, various changes were made until 1911-1912 it was adopted. Later it was changed to military specifications and refined until in 1923 the modified pistol <strong>1911  Government model </strong>was completed and in 1925 renamed the <strong>Automatic Pistol, Caliber .45 Model 1911 A1</strong>. Since 1923 nothing really has been done to upgrade the pistol in the military. Clones with upgrade components are everywhere but few if any have done more than just cosmetics to improve the accuracy of what otherwise is a good shooting platform.</p>
	<p><strong>The problem with the 1911 designed by John Browning is:</strong> a. It was designed to function loosely as a Defensive Weapon for military applications. b. It was not possible in the late 1800&#8217;s to hold tolerances due to the type of steel and machines available to cut it and even though the tolerances were tightened up in the 1930&#8217;s. No CNC. No CAD. Loose tolerances. It STILL remained a &#8220;defensive&#8221; sidearm for very close work.</p>
	<p>In 1986-87 while General Manager of <strong>Pachmayr Gun Works </strong>in Los Angeles, CA , <strong>Karl Lippard</strong> was approached to revise the 1911 A1 for specific use in the Marine Corps, Delta Force and &#8220;Other Government agencies&#8221; so to speak. The result was three entirely different pistols: <strong>A &#8220;NCO Grade Combat&#8221;, and &#8220;Officer Grade Combat, and a &#8220;General Grade Combat&#8221; pistol. </strong></p>
	<p>The problem at hand was terrorist activity. The Military namely the Marine Corps, had a tired old pistol called the M1911 A1. You could not shoot yourself at 10 feet, they rattled like a can full of stones, had a trigger pull often over 6 pounds, sights so small that it required magnification to see them, excessive recoil to the hand and as I said were not accurate&#8230;&#8230;Fact was, no body could shoot one much less agress live targets danger close. The terrorists had to be engaged and taken down. What could be done about it?</p>
	<p><strong>The result was (and still is) the Combat NCO M1911 we call the A2 .45acp.</strong></p>
	<p><align ="left"><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/KarlMilitary.JPG' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>Karl Lippard redesigned 1911-A1 model pistols for the military at Pachmayr circa 1987 including the Marine Corps fighting knife shown.</strong></p>
	<p>Now here we come to the difficult part of the discussion on the <strong>&#8220;Combat NCO,&#8221;</strong> of where here to begin. I will try and get that straight without being too pious.<br />
I guess it begins in Vietnam 1965 in a place called Cam Ne 3. Then Corporal Lippard while having been wounded several times, could no longer  carry heavy equipment or wear body armor. Nor could he carry anything heavier than a pistol to engage the enemy with.  That pistol was a <strong>USMC model 1911-A1 </strong>standard issue. The shortcomings of THAT pistol and the resulting combat experiences in Cam Ne and An Trac 3 forever made an imprint on the future gun designer. <strong>That pistol, eccentual to ANYONE engaged in heads up, face to face combat; HAD to be modified.</strong></p>
	<p>Was that put softly enough?</p>
	<p>Therefore when the &#8220;military&#8221; came calling for an <strong>&#8220;Offensive sidearm weapon&#8221;, </strong>that heavy combat experience with the 1911-A1 Colt at <strong>Cam Ne </strong>was applied to their requirement.</p>
	<p>The military et al <strong>criteria </strong>was a <strong>&#8220;Multiple use Offensive pistol for close combat under all conditions&#8221;. </strong>HALO operations, Delta Force, Force Recon, SEAL use,  all were to be taken into consideration. Concentration was on Terrorists application and engagement. Aircraft assaults against armored adversaries. Use in extreme cold such as HALO insertion the weapon must function and not freeze to the hand; operate in extreme heat of the desert with sand to clog its functionality. They would like the firearm to have more range than 50 yards for open conditions and to &#8220;remain essecentually a modified 1911-A1 weapon currently in use&#8221;. It had to be suppression compatible&#8230;..&#8221; In other words, a serious offensive weapon within the confines of a 1911-A1. </p>
	<p>The end result was the &#8220;NCO Grade Combat&#8221;. Why NCO? Well first, an NCO would be the user of such a weapon. Second, an NCO does it all. He goes where he is ordered and gets the job done. Anytime, anywhere, under any conditions. The pistol meets all of the military requirements asked then&#8230;.and the ONLY ONE that meets it today. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/50tragetcopy.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>25 rounds from 5 magazines rapid fire at 25 yards fired on a 50 yard target witnessed by the owner: Lt. William Davis, USMC</strong></p>
	<p>Fast forward 2006&#8230;..Iraq. Afganistan. Individual Marines and Army personnel requested the &#8220;NCO&#8221; again and would pay whatever the price personally it cost to have it in hand when the chips were down. The 9mm would NOT do on an enemy up on drugs that could not be stopped with a rifle&#8230;..So &#8220;Fully Cloaked&#8221; NCO&#8217;s were (are) made to keep our men alive. And why cloaked? The military today will Court Marshal anyone with a personal weapon in combat&#8230;.Therefore the &#8220;Combat NCO&#8221;,  <strong>(which has been requested and used since 1987)</strong>, is hidden INSIDE the skin of a normal 1911 or 1911- A1,  to provide functionality, accuracy, a 2.8 lb. trigger and still be quickly changed to assume the assignment of the owner. </p>
	<div align="left"><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/rowe2.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>This is a cloaked Colt Government Model 1911 delivered in 2007  for a U.S. Army soldier. External NCO components were not used.</strong></p>
	<p>So what is it exactly that comprises a now called &#8220;Combat NCO&#8221;?</p>
	<p>The <strong>&#8220;Combat NCO&#8221;</strong> is a malleable shooting platform based on the Browning design. It has over 19 components that have never been sold to the public before and many components never viewd by anyone but an enemy on the receiving end of it. It is best described as a shooting system which exceeds all military requirements. <strong>It is a pistol that requires average skill to aggress targets up to, and beyond, 350 yards.</strong> It can be fully suppressed, changed to an <strong>&#8220;Urban Sniper Rifle&#8221;</strong> firing 5.56mm rounds in 3 minutes. It can <strong>laze targets </strong>for aircraft and other assets without alteration. It is balanced by an <strong>extended nose piece </strong>which incorporates <em>other features </em>that retard night blindness during engagement under fire. It is a <strong>unimanual</strong> operating firearm. <strong>In other words, the shooters hand never moves from its shooting position during multimagazine shooting events. </strong></p>
	<div align="left"><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/FrameStopcopy.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>A Slide Stop must extend back far enough to be operated by the shooting hand. A  common feature on Frank Pachmayr Signature model combat pistols in the 80&#8217;s.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/StopABcopy.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Here is shown a standard length, an extended length and a Brazier NCO length Slide Stop.</strong></p>
	<p>That also means that the <strong>&#8220;Slide Stop&#8221;, and &#8220;Magazine Release&#8221;</strong> must be accessed with the <em>shooting hand </em>while the exchange of magazines and subsequent control of the weapon is dedicated to the other hand. I say other hand because the firearm is ambidextrious. A shooter <strong>MUST</strong> (as at Cam Ne) be able to shift to another hand with equal ease if wounded. (FBI Florida shootout could not) The magazine <strong>must jettison clear </strong>of the firearm by way of a weighted device <strong>AND</strong>, if stuck, to be removed by the use of it. That part is forever called a <strong>&#8220;Cam Ne&#8221; </strong>from that experience. </p>
	<div align="center"><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/sitecamnecopy.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>The &#8220;Cam Ne&#8221; and &#8220;Combat NCO&#8221; sights are part of the shooting system. Now available for your gun are the NCO components that make the difference. Barrel, links, sites front and back or the entire gun!</strong></p>
	<p>The sites <strong>must not </strong>reflect back to a shooters face in all possible angels of engagement. A NCO doesn&#8217;t. It has the ability to engage targets in &#8220;double tap&#8221; to 100+ yards, and, <strong>engage effectively to 350</strong>. (Using the NCO/Lippard/Elmer Keith methods)  </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/CombatNCOcopy.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>Test report witnessed of the first &#8220;NCO Grade Combat&#8221; to 400 yards is shown above. </strong></p>
	<p><strong>Recent testimonial: &#8220;This weapon is not only everything you billed it to be but way beyond. Holly shit this 45 is great. I finally shot it this last weekend. I was impressed buy the groups at close range but also at my 100 yard range. Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! &#8221; Steve Hammers, COS, CO. 11/26/2007.</strong></p>
	<p>Well there ARE a host of M1911 clone pistols made today. Most like <strong>Kimber, Springfield, Thompson, Dan Wesson, </strong>all main materials like frame and slide etc. are made outside of the United States. Just look on the frame next to the grips for that information. <strong>The Combat NCO is made here in Colorado Springs one at a time.</strong> Tested by the man who designed it with retired Marines on the bench with him making the guns. We use the finest parts and components made for the pistol and as a result, <strong>will repair at no charge the pistol for the lifetime of the owner.</strong>&#8230;..<strong>Uuuuuh, how is that? You send us a gun through normal wear that fails to function properly and we will service the gun for free&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
What if the owner shot 100,000 rounds through the gun?</strong><strong>We don&#8217;t care if you shot 150,000 rounds we would like to service it. </strong>Our Patented Parts and or designed components are <strong>designed to extended the life of the M1911 by 1000%. That&#8217;s One Thousand Percent! 165,000 rounds to you.</strong> Now it is probable the barrel will not last that long but the NCO will. So you call the ball. If what you need is a NCO and not a cheap substitute, think again about the Lifetime warranty. The only Pistol on earth that has one. The only Pistol on earth that is an NCO with the accuracy we claim and the warranty to back it up when you have done your worst to wear it out&#8230;&#8230;..Whisper to me who makes the finest M1911 in the world. Its called a NCO and its made in Colorado. </p>
	<p>The <strong>&#8220;Combat NCO&#8221;  frame and recesses have been altered </strong>to function up to -76 to a plus 1200 degrees fahrenheit. The barrels made by Joseph Brazier have the new <strong>&#8220;Lippard Military and Lippard Wide Link&#8221; </strong>to insure absolute return to battery extending pistol and barrel life from a conventional of 15,000 rounds to well beyond 100,000 rounds. (The &#8220;Wide Link&#8221; is a elaboration and variation of Frank Pachmayr&#8217;s design)</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/3linkscopy.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>Patent Pending &#8220;Lippard Wide Link, Lippard Military&#8221;  left and center. A conventional Colt 1911 A-1 link of today, right.<br />
There are 7 Patents or Patents Pending by Karl Lippard on the 1911/Pistols/Cannons/Shotguns. No other pistols use NCO Patented components.</strong></p>
	<p>The <strong>&#8220;Lippard Military Link&#8221;</strong> allows for new barrel or conventional barrel installation without alteration. The &#8220;Lippard Multi Caliber barrel&#8221; (not shown during patent application) allows for changing of worn barrels in less than 3 minutes. Further, the Combat NCO fires unaltered 3 calibers of munitions. Only the Hardball Military ammo is discussed. <strong>However, the other two make the &#8220;Combat NCO&#8221; THE MOST LETHAL PISTOL SYSTEM IN EXISTANCE to any range where the human eye can decern a target.</strong></p>
	<p>Welllllll, &#8230;.is there more?<br />
Uuuuuh&#8230;.YESSSSS, there IS! &#8230;..But this WAS a general answer to the question. </p>
	<p><strong>Is the &#8220;Combat NCO&#8221; available today?&#8230;</p>
	<p>Since 2008 for civilians, yes it is. Largely they are hand made to order, in small quantities with critical components of S7 VAC tool steel. Price is $5,000.00 each with the order,  (plus extra&#8217;s)  from Joseph Brazier, Ltd.</strong> &#8230;&#8230;<strong>And as all Marines and Army who are using the pistol today know, the man from &#8220;Cam Ne&#8221; builds and shoots the gun personally first, has been in harms way, and together with them joins the shooter where the metal meets the meat&#8230;&#8230;</strong> How many guns are made today and shot but the man who designed it? </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Nosepiecegroup.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>These boys are military and share something in common. They all screw into a part that makes them <em>silent.</em> </strong></p>
	<p><strong>The Marine Corps &#8220;Combat NCO&#8221;. </strong>Now you know something about what it is and the men perhaps who carry it. But like its namesake the Marine NCO, <strong>you have no idea of its full capability.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/NCO1.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>A cloaked NCO comes in unexpected containers.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/NCO2.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Alone the military version lacks few accessories.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/NCO3.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Combined with a knife designed for Marine Corps hand to hand combat system these tools come with training manuals for proper use and are not available for export. </strong></p>
	<p>For more information here read: &#8220;Combat NCO” Pistol Debut in .45 ACP, here in the &#8220;News&#8221; catagory.</p>
	<p><strong><em>Note: Joseph Brazier, Ltd. et al, extends it services and technology to the military for free and to the limits of its ability, to all men fighting in combat, anytime, and anywhere , it is requested.</em></strong>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</align></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/31/combat-nco-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classic 64 Return?</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/30/classic-64-return/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/30/classic-64-return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Information</category>
	<category>Technical</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/30/classic-64-return/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Classic 64 lives again......?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ahhh, the <strong>Pre-64 model 70 Action</strong>. Gone forever&#8230;.True. <strong>4140 steel</strong>? Yes, I guess. We have moved on in materials and design. But can we get the old Action made of high-tech materials and still get the favorite  Action of choice back in the 40&#8217;s? Sure, it can be done.</p>
	<p>But there are a number of issues that confront modern manufacturing using the old Action that cost a great deal to replicate. Have a look; a close look at what I am talking about above.<br />
The roughness in the old Actions was due to trying to make a difficult part, at a low price, using old material and at best, NC machines. Result? Well, <strong>Winchester</strong> did leave the building didn&#8217;t they? At least to Belgium. The old tooling is gone, workers pumping gas in New Haven; well you know the story.</p>
	<p><strong>Note: We have removed pictures of the modified Winchester action at our clients request. It is his wish to make a News release upon receipt of components. He feels we may preempt that if shown here. So return later for that release expected in 45-60 days.</strong></p>
	<p>But can we do the job without redesigning what the customer feels sacred? Uuuuh, yes. And we have for a client in the USA shown here made of VAC material S7&#8230;&#8230;Ooops! Uuuuh and NOT made of cast material? No, but from <strong>solid billet </strong>using the finest steel on earth!!</p>
	<p>Well, then can one BUY a <strong>Classic 64 </strong> today from <strong><em>Joseph Brazier </em></strong>made of <strong>vacuum arc remelt steel??? </strong>Yes.</p>
	<p>The <strong>Classic-64 </strong>of the old Winchester design can be obtained today for <strong>$1,350.00 </strong>each made of S7 (without double square bridge shown) complete with bolt, bolt shroud, a good looking trigger and sear.  At the moment, our production is dedicated to a client first before inventory is available to purchase.<br />
End of story? Perhaps but not quite&#8230;. </p>
	<p>You say you want a <strong>solid billet box magazine </strong>too? Sure&#8230;.. When we get orders for them we&#8217;ll put some on the production schedule&#8230;What else you think you need, good wood? Sure. That comes under <a href="http://www.josephbrazier.com/firearm-wood.php">&#8220;Custom Wood&#8221;</a>.  </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/woodonhand.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>Wood for Browning firearms on hand from grade 1 thru 6.</strong></p>
	<p>Basically we can accomodate what you need. For now lets see how the Action goes. </p>
	<p>For more information and views of our Actions and Parts, be sure to visit <a href="http://www.josephbrazier.com/gallery.php">Gallery</a>, <a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karllippard.com</a>, or our  <strong>new icon connection to our Fine Firearm section on the Home Page.</strong></p>
	<p>Karl Lippard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/30/classic-64-return/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can We Talk Parts?</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/29/can-we-talk-parts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/29/can-we-talk-parts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Information</category>
	<category>Technical</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/29/can-we-talk-parts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Parts for English Shotguns and Rifles are hard to come by as most are made by hand. Many American Shotguns and Rifles have the same problem if they were made before say 1930. Joseph Brazier carries some of these parts and seeks to update older firearms as they come in with perpetual parts and components. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Parts for <strong>English Shotguns and Rifles </strong>are hard to come by as most are made by hand. Many American Shotguns and Rifles have the same problem if they were made before say 1930. <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>carries some of these parts and seeks to update older firearms as they come in with perpetual parts and components. However, with things such as shotgun screws and V springs used in many of these older guns we want to make those available where possible to service these old guns.</p>
	<p><strong>Shotgun Screws:</strong> There are a host of shotgun screws. Made in the past by a Screwer the thread patterns take on a number of types and are very hard to match today. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/SB003copy.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Machine Screw Blanks used for Sideplates</strong></p>
	<p>To make a shotgun wood screw for a <strong><a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard</a>, James Purdey or Holland &#038; Holland </strong>one needs to start with a proper Shotgun Wood Screw Blank. For an English sidelock or boxlock shotgun or rifle one of the more famous makers of these blanks was <strong>S. W. Silver &#038; Co </strong>of England who is a purveyor of specific screws for the Trade with thread pattern used for over 100 years. The wood screw thread pattern is different than an American wood screw pattern and is design specific for the indexing of the screw for shotguns and rifles. Here you might start with a #1003 Short Trigger Guard and a #1002 Medium Trigger Guard screw to begin fitting it to your shotgun with a pattern no doubt on your firearm already. Now you can replace that disfigured shotgun screw which suffered misuse by a common screw driver with a new one and change the complexion and value dramically.<br />
Most common types of shotgun wood screws are of a countersunk variety. The <strong>Trigger Guard </strong>corresponds to </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/TrigBowUp_01.jpg' alt='Trigger Bow 2' /><br />
<strong>Brazier Trigger Bow</strong></p>
	<p>the countersunk screw. One cuts a slot in the oversized shotgun wood screw head and turns it into the Trigger Guard on the Shotgun into the wood until firm. Then the sides of the screw is marked at a 12 and 6 o’clock position and removed. Now these marks are carried down the sides of the screw. The shotgun wood screw can then be removed and profiled down to a semi finished shape, a slot recut, the screw reestablished in the wood and filially profiled to the shape of the trigger guard. When completed it can again be removed and blued, engraved or left bright as the choice dictates.<br />
<img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Screws.jpg' alt='Screws' /><br />
<strong>Various Shotgun Screw Blanks used in the Trade</strong></p>
	<p>Shotgun Wood Screws for English guns and many America firearms are fashioned this way from Blanks. Like wise a Trigger Guard with a flat under surface can be made in the same way by simply removing the countersunk surface of the screw under surface. For without this type of shotgun wood screw one has to buy the more aggressive thread pattern in America or even worse, resort to using sheet metal screws or an improper wood screw sold today. You can of course use these but you have alignment issues and if the screw becomes slightly loose the edge now becomes a knife edge which is not a desirable thing for ones hands. The less aggressive thread pattern of the English Shotgun wood would not present this risk.<br />
There are other Shotgun Screws for Trigger Guard, Forend, Tip and Toe Pins, Hand Pins, Breech Pins, (By Pins we mean the English name for Screws) Lock Plate Pins of various sizes, Top Lever Screws, Hammer or Tumbler Screws, are all the screws commonly used in the making of shotguns and rifles. Of course <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>is about the &#8220;making of components&#8221; as well  as Rifle and Shotgun Actions, Sidelock Plates, </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Hollandlock4_01.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Holland &#038; Holland Sidelock Sideplate by Joseph Brazier</strong></p>
	<p>Hammers, wood stocks for rifles and shotguns, <strong>SolidSolid, MonoSolid </strong>and a host of barrels for which we have Patent applications applied for. The main difference in the <strong>Brazier</strong> components today is that we make high precision parts of superior steel. On the other hand we realize that there is a need for the older handmade parts to service guns of the past and we will attempt to expand our inventory to meet those needs based on demand. One could grab a file and go to work making a new screw the old way or step up to Joseph Brazier and upgrade to new technology&#8230;.One of the ways we do that is to design new parts to replace the old making life easier for not only the gunmaker but the end user as well. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/DSC02270.JPG' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>Joseph Brazier Hidden Trigger Bow Screw.</strong></p>
	<p>Like this New trigger bow screw that has a hidden screw device internally. Difficult to make yes, but we are in the 21st century. Why not show it??</p>
	<p>While we are on the subject of parts <strong>“V” springs </strong>are a bit of mystery that comes to mind that might take a moment to discuss.<br />
<img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/ASVS01_01.jpg' alt='' /></p>
	<p>&#8220;V&#8221; Springs are not generally available as a replacement part for your Shotgun. Shotgun V Springs are largely made by hand using very old processes. Those processes are kept secret to the maker as to the steel used and the methods in which to hardened and temper this Spring. Second, generic springs are often used and modified in size and shape to fabricate for various kinds of guns. <strong>James Purdey </strong>as example </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/PA001y.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>James Purdey Action by Joseph Brazier circa 1990</strong></p>
	<p>has a very unique spring for their sidelock shotgun designed by <strong>Frederick Beesley </strong>in 1979. It is a big brute which incorporates a roller. This type of spring made by <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>up until 1996 until the owner passed away was fairly economical. From the Purdey factory today? maybe £3,000.00. Well, if asked to produce those for the Trade using modern methods I suspect a Pair would cost £60.00 from Brazier.<br />
But other V Springs such as might be used on a Holland &#038; Holland are difficult to make other than the old method for the sake of space. The V Spring lives often in a confined area and must produce several hundred pounds of pressure.  A coil spring as example cannot duplicate that effort. Further back in the <strong><em>Holland and Holland</em></strong> lock design is yet another specialty Arch Spring for the Sear Arm. It has a tongue projection and a through hole for screw attachment. As it provides constant pressure on the sear arm it too is difficult to replace with anything other than the Spring for this design. In the <strong>Joseph Brazier</strong> designed <a href="http://www.johnwilkesgunmakers.com">John Wilkes Shotgun</a>, the locks have been designed to use coil springs. The reason is obvious in that replacement is inexpensive and reliability is assured. I might say however that it was difficult to design out the V Spring because of the advantages inherent in this type of Spring and displacement area offered for function. Soon, Brazier will offer conversions to replace many of these V Springs as firearms come in for such things as wood Stocking, rebarreling and the like where by a customer can receive an overhaul extending the life of his shotgun or rifle for another 100 years.</p>
	<p>I mentioned <strong><em>Shotgun Hammers</em></strong>. These can be either internal or external ones. Most of the hammers of  concern would be the external ones. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/HH001R_01.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Holland &#038; Holland hand made hammer from Brazier</strong></p>
	<p>Generally made from castings and today using lost wax process, replacing a broken or missing hammer is a costly concern. As these were often hand shaped, Shotgun Hammers are just about an original. What Joseph Brazier does is machine those using a number of technologies. We do not cast anything. We machine it pretty much like the Cannon Locks we made for the <strong>HMS Victory</strong>. While the Hammer and Fizen were machined, because of the many curves and shape no one would believe a machine could duplicate a hand finished part formed by casting. But we can.</p>
	<p><strong>Shotgun and Rifle Barrels: </strong>I think it common knowledge now that Joseph Brazier can make just about any kind of barrel for the Trade. A best quality English Shotgun Barrel called a <strong>&#8220;Chopper Lump Barrel&#8221;</strong> can cost £16,000.00 or more today. This type of barrel involves the used of two tubes that resemble a chopper or axe. These are then filed, and welded together. Other trades are involved with things attached or fashioned to it such as ribs. Ribs are those parts that provide a sighting plane called a Top Rib. Or a Bottom or Side Ribs which cover the joining of the two tubes and make the amalgamation of  components as more rigid body to take the explosive nature of the finished product. Production time for such barrels can be 2 ½ years covering 8 trades in the process. The <strong>Joseph Brazier SolidSolid™ barrel </strong>is one single piece of steel and has a retail cost of about £1,400.00 ($2,800.00) in comparison. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Copyofmaterial.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Brazier <em>SolidSolid</em> barrel begins as a solid piece of VAC steel</strong></p>
	<p>Bursting properties of the <strong>SolidSolid™</strong> is 8 times greater than the conventionally made Chopper Lump barrel. <strong>So why would one wish to replace an old barrel with a </strong><strong>Chopper Lump barrel </strong>for 5 times more money? (Reported to be more than $45,000.00 on a Fabbri) So there is no longer a need for a Chopper Lump barrel. It offers no advantage and cost is certainly out of the question.<br />
The <strong>MonoSolid™</strong> takes the place of a Monobloc type barrel. In Monobloc barrel it is comprised of many components. A Bloc which fits into an Action, two tubes that are soldered into it, a Top and Bottom Rib and Forend Hook which is soldered to the two tubes. Most mid to low range shotguns use this type of barrel today as it is far less expensive than a Chopper Lump barrel option. But, now we come to the <strong>Joseph Brazier designed MonoSolid™. </strong>What it does is provide a homogeneous barrel tube ribs composite made on one piece of steel with two finger projections. These two projections are then slid into a Monobloc section and silver soldered in place in about 30 seconds. Barrel completed, end of story. Meanwhile our conventional <strong>Monobloc barrel </strong>must go through 8 more trades toward its completion which can take as much as a week. When done, it is what it is, a economical process that is out of date, 50% weaker, and 90% less likely to stay together the life of the shotgun. So why would someone want to have a barrel that costs the same as a <strong>MonoSolid™</strong>, take longer to make, cannot be hot blued, difficult to be repaired and 50% less strong??? It makes no sense. The only two firearms in the world today to use our high tech barrels are the <strong><em>Karl Lippard O/U </em></strong>and a limited edition John Wilkes designed by Joseph Brazier. Smart? <strong><em>Karl Lippard</em></strong> believes his customers to be educated.  Charging £16,000.00 for original or replacement barrels might justify a price for a gun but not be leading edge for his clients who demand value and safety.</p>
	<p>So what’s up for the future here is that you find an old shotgun with beautiful engraving and a sound action. Maybe it has a short or broken stock or has barrels that are too thin, out of Proof, or pitted to much to shoot. You just package it up and send it to Joseph Brazier. With our new CNC barrel boring machine and CNC wood stock making machine, this old wall hanger can be put back in service for a lifetime of use and pleasure. Perhaps we all cannot afford to buy a new £100,000.00 shotgun but we can restore an unserviceable one into shooting condition for far less.<br />
Besides a source of parts for these older model firearms we need to shoot them. Brazier has an inventory of <strong>Loading Dies</strong> both used and new. What dies are not available we can make to assist in the testing and use of most calibers. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/243set394.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p>In the area of <strong>wood for Shotgun and Rifle </strong>we have on delivery in later March a new CNC </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/HeadedOnlycopy.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p>machine dedicated to production of wood. This will include <strong>Winchester</strong> (for which we made Actions and components now from bar stock), <strong>Browning, Remington, Ruger, also the English and Italian guns of Westley Richards, Holland &#038; Holland, James Purdey, Churchill, Rigby, Jeffery, Lang </strong>to name a few, as well as <strong>Kreighoff, Perazzi, Fabbri, Beretta, Boses, Gamba, FAMARS, Rizzini,</strong>  among otheres in boxlock and sidelock configurations. Please enquire for assistance.</p>
	<p>Coming soon are our accessories of  Turnscrews, Oil bottles, Cleaning rods for Rifle and Shotgun. We have taken design queues from late 1700  hand made products  and revamped those to new technology production methods. Completed in drawings and CAD we will squeeze those in production as soon as scheduling will allow.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/AllTurnscrews1copy_02.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p>In short, <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>wishes to reduce the production time of manafacturers with our components AND to service the public when service is not availabe to you. It&#8217;s a big task. Can&#8217;t do it in a day. But we are well under way. Please contact us to schedule your needs. Think of <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>when you are looking to restore a fine Shotgun, Rifle, Pistol or parts to get the job done.</p>
	<p>Karl Lippard, Managing Director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/29/can-we-talk-parts/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Range Pistol Case</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/28/range-pistol-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/28/range-pistol-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/28/range-pistol-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The finest pistol range case available today!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For many years shooters have been confronted with how to grapple with their guns to and from the range, ranch and the issue of where to even store them safely. Today that problem has been solved for good with the <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>case made for <strong><a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard </a>fine firearms </strong>and available through this website.<br />
<img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/pistolbox1.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Case has a comfortable carrying handle or shoulder strap.</strong></p>
	<p>Our case is made of quality aluminum. It is further powder coated in forest green. The case has strong <em>twist lock closures </em>with a <em>key lock </em>for further protection both at the range, while carrying, and safety from child tampering at home.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/pistolbox2.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>The case locks open securely and will not tip.</strong></p>
	<p>The case is based upon the old and very fine <strong>Pachmayr or Bullseye </strong>range case made years ago. One of the problems I encountered as General Manager of Pachmayr with the product was the carrying handle being difficult to use and handle failure over the years. Second was it was originally made of wood. Joints  often became separated due to the weight and age of the box. This could dump the contents on the ground. Later the plastic version was an improvement but not in the catagory of the <strong>Brazier </strong>case you see here.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/pistollatch.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>A spring loaded thumb screw secures the door open.</strong></p>
	<p>You can see clearly in the first photo the <em>stainless steel hinges </em>and <strong>strap attachments </strong>rivited and used on this case. The best that money can buy. Now look closely at the door securing latch on our case. When the door is open it is often used as a platform for a scope in which to view the target downrange. To secure the door in the open position the case features <em>two spring loaded threaded screws</em>. <strong>Once tightened the door cannot be closed</strong>. <strong>Accessories to accommodate optics for range use are included with the case </strong>and afixed to the door. There are a host of variables to accommodate most <strong>configurations for left and right hand shooters</strong>.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Pistoldrwr1.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Slide out ball bearing drawer for 3 pistols.</strong></p>
	<p>In this configuration the ball bearing drawer slides smoothly out of the case to allow access to the firearm to be used or stored. It is attached and cannot be dislodged accidently. The bottom of the drawer is padded to protect the pistoil when resting in the cradle. The firearm is held in place by a large threaded securing nut visible on the front by compression.<br />
In front of the drawer is a tray for ammo or other tools required during use.<br />
Below the drawer is room for ammo, guns in soft cases, cleaning equipment and scope.</p>
	<p>All in all, this IS the finest pistol carrying case we know to exist. It is rugged, secure, handsome, and will last many generations. It measures <strong>16w x 14h x 8.75d </strong>and weighs less than 14 pounds. <strong>Priced at only $249.95 plus $30.00 shipping </strong>it must be the best deal you will ever encounter on a quality product like this.<br />
<strong>Order yours today from Joseph Brazier.  </p>
	<p></strong><strong>Karl C. Lippard, Managing Director</strong>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/28/range-pistol-case/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Factory for Wood &#038; Barrels</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/27/impossible-wood-barrels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/27/impossible-wood-barrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Information</category>
	<category>Technical</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/27/impossible-wood-barrels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Facility for CNC Wood and gun Barrel Boring]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Joseph Brazier Ltd.</strong> has opened (by appointment only) its new 5,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility in Colorado Springs, CO on February 19, 2007. Its primary concentration will be the boring of <strong><a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard O/U </a>and SxS sidelock guns </strong>and for the Trade worldwide. Second, to manufacture high tolerance <strong>wood stock components </strong>by CNC reducing manufacturing time by several years on sidelock guns. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/officecopy.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p>The new <strong>Bacci CNC wood machine </strong>is the most sophisticated in the United States. Dedicated to wood with critical dimensional requirements a manufacturer of firearms or an end user can expect assistance not available before.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/bacci.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Bacci CNC wood manufacturing machine.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Wilkesstock.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>CNC cut wood is precise.</strong></p>
	<p><strong>Competition:</strong> We do not compete with dealers on the sale of firearms or carry opinions to a shooter on what type of gun they purchase. </p>
	<p><strong>Fitting:</strong> Fitting takes time. Generally a correct stock fitting will cost only $165.00. Free credit when wood is purchased in conjunction with a fitting. Having fit for competition thousands of difficult stocks, we feel we are not lacking in experience. It is your assurance that your customer will be happy with the result and that someone doing it understands the business in its entirety. <strong>Mr. Lippard </strong>is available to train Dealers or Manufacturers in fitting or you can buy his instruction tape online from the <strong><a href="http://www.acgg.org/">American Custom Gunmakers Guild </a></strong>as the Guild instruction to stockmakers for fitting stocks for competition, and all applications. We assure you the method is different and quite specific. No smoke and mirrors. You will become expert yourself quickly and can provide accurate measurements yourself compatible with ours. If with a client at our offices you can watch of course the fitting process for free. <strong>Shooters with physical handicaps</strong>, or other maladies are welcome. I assure you we can fit any customer regardless of impairment and happy to do so.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/office1.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Factory Offices of Joseph Brazier  in Colorado</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/office6copy.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/office2.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>Wood:</strong> We sell wood or you can provide your own. Terms are: 100% payment with the order.<br />
A customer can pick wood from three bins of English, Bastone and Claro mixed. Entry level of $1,000.00, 3A bin at $1,550.00 and 4-5A bin at $2,000.00. One can also pick from posted inventory on <strong>www.JosephBrazier.com </strong> add machining cost of $1,000.00 to it and arrive at a complete cost. (Lower priced wood are also available for guns such as Model 12’s, Brownings etc. where smaller wood is required and generall Black Walnut.)  A stock is then completed, with Pad, to factory quality machined and finished. Any additional specifications are extra that change the CAD. CAD alteration is from $300.00.<br />
From this you can see that a $1,000. standard piece of wood for say, Kreighoff, is about the same as dealer wood credit for custom wood for this maker. However a customer can select their own wood at Brazier that fits. The upgrades to 4A are reasonable when one considers the machine time included. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/sig4.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>Karl Lippard Signature O/U stock from Brazier</strong></p>
	<p>So, in this example a gun that is fitted costs $0.00 to $165.00 and a dealer is not out of pocket really anything. If your customer wants something more he gets what he pays for.</p>
	<p><strong>Stocks:</strong> Premium Wood is also available for selection from $2,100.00 to $6,000.00 (or more) at <strong>Brazier</strong>. Some may be very exotic. They are kept under key in different rooms. Qualified customers may select from those by invitation. </p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/blank.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p>The <strong>MMC6 impregnation </strong> process cost <strong>$300.00 per stock</strong>. This impregnation is particularly valuable in highly figured wood. It reduces the risk of cracking by 90%. Weight remains about the same and does not effect most wood finishing. This service will be available in late 2007.</p>
	<p>Right now <strong>Brazier</strong> can do fittings for making stocks any time by appointment for $165.00. Free with the purchase of a machined stock. We do not expect to get to individual orders until about April or so of 2007. You should therefore commit to our waiting list by email letter of intent. And if an FFL, have a copy of License on file.</p>
	<p>Our new address is across street from the <strong>Whistling Pines Gun Club</strong>, an indoor shooting range just off the HWY 24. Our address will be 1419 Woolsey Heights, Colorado Springs 80915. When fully up to speed our services should help the Gun Trade and clients as well with all  gun stock requirements.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/ShootingGrounds_01.jpg' alt='' /> </p>
	<p><strong>Joseph Brazier projection for 2007 CAD wood production in order is:</strong> </p>
	<p><strong>Wilkes </strong>Sidelock O/U in 12 and 20 gauge limited to 25 guns..<br />
<strong>Karl Lippard SolidRifle&trade; </strong>in Signature and Safari grades<br />
<strong>Perazzi</strong> O/U is 12 &#038; 20 Sporting and Trap<br />
<strong>Kreighoff </strong>O/U 12 Sporting &#038; Trap<br />
<strong>Browning T-Bolt </strong>grade II<br />
<strong>Browning O/U</strong> standard 12 &#038; 20<br />
<strong>Browning HP Bolt rifle </strong>Medallion<br />
<strong>Winchester Pre-64 rifles</strong>. Standard or High Grade wood<br />
<strong>Note:</strong> Foreign and Custom orders are inclusive and integrated in this schedule but not listed. We make <strong>custom stocks and forends </strong>for any firearm.</p>
	<p><strong>And of course remember our O/U barrels for any maker listed beginning with SolidSolid&trade;  O/U&#8217;s at $10,000.00 each. Barrel boring will be taking place at this facility.</strong></p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Drill.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>New Joseph Brazier Barrel Boring Machine used for O/U barrels to 50 inches.</strong></p>
	<p><strong>Joseph Brazier, Ltd. </strong>has commissioned the manufacture of a CNC machine dedicated to the <strong>boring of </strong><strong><a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard </a></strong>designed SolidSolid ™ and MonoSolid ™ barrels. Difficult to make these barrels are solid billet VAC steel and make other forms of barrel making now obsolete. No solder means no ribs to come loose. Higher bursting properties mean safety and perpetual reliability. <strong>Chopper lump barrels </strong>to the client might cost $30,000.00 each. <strong>Joseph Brazier </strong>can make a one off barrel in <strong>SolidSolid&trade; </strong> for $10,000.00. The choice is modern or old. Strong or soft. Costly or reasonably priced.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Wilkes36copy_03.jpg' alt='' /><br />
<strong>&#8220;SolidSolid&#8221;&trade;  barrels are made of solid Vacuum Arc Remelt Steel.</strong></p>
	<p>So whether your needs are wood or barrels you know where our location is. And say hello to <strong>Karl Lippard</strong> too while there. Their Sidelock O/U is available and <strong>Brazier </strong>is cutting wood stocks for the New <strong><a href="http://www.karllippard.com">Karl Lippard  </a>SolidRifle ™ </strong>as noted above. The only one piece bolt action rifle ever produced&#8230;.But that&#8217;s what we do isn&#8217;t it? The impossible!</p>
	<p>Select your wood and reserve a production spot for you firearm needs today. </p>
	<p><strong>Joseph Brazier, Ltd.</strong>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/27/impossible-wood-barrels/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pocket size oil bottles</title>
		<link>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/26/pocket-size-oil-bottles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/26/pocket-size-oil-bottles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>News</category>
		<guid>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/26/pocket-size-oil-bottles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	You know one thing that is hard to find for the gun case or fishing tackle box is a proper oiler that is not the size of a gas can! Our small Oilers measure just 1.75 inches in length shown here next to a USA Quarter.
	 
	We make the  &#8220;O&#8221; ring sealed lids in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You know one thing that is hard to find for the gun case or fishing tackle box is a proper oiler that is not the size of a gas can! Our small Oilers measure just 1.75 inches in length shown here next to a USA Quarter.</p>
	<p><img src='http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/wp-content/Oilbottlessmall.jpg' alt='Small Oil Bottle' /> </p>
	<p>We make the  &#8220;O&#8221; ring sealed lids in <strong>Red, Natural White and Blue</strong>. The lid also has an applicator rod formed into it for ease of application of oil or other lubricants for your fine firearm or fishing reel. A nice look and perfect gift for anyone.  Find them in the parts section for $11.95  each and pop one in your pocket today. </p>
	<p><strong>For manufacturers and Corporations ask for custom nomenclature bottles with logos and in different configurations. We have hundreds of design ideas that can satisfy every need.</strong></p>
	<p>Joseph Brazier, Ltd.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.josephbrazier.com/news/26/pocket-size-oil-bottles/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
